A ranked list of processes
The review looks at the work where people spend the most effort reading, checking, matching or writing, and ranks it by value and by how ready it is.
Good first candidates happen often, follow rules or guidance a person could explain, and have an outcome you can measure.
Whether the data is ready
For each candidate the review finds where the data lives, whether it is complete enough, who is allowed to see it and whether it can be reached safely through an API or a connector.
Data that is scattered or locked in one system is not a reason to stop. It changes what the first step should be.
The controls you need
Who approves what, what must be logged, which data must never leave your tenancy and how the system is switched off. Agreeing these at the start avoids rebuilding later.
A measure and a baseline
For the first process the review agrees one measure, such as time per case, and records where it stands today. Every later result is judged against it.
A first result you can see
A review that ends in a document leaves the hardest question open. A better one ends by showing the first process working on your own data, so you can judge the approach before you commit to more.
A short list of what comes next
The other ranked processes, in order, with what each would need. That becomes the plan once the first one has proved itself.
What to prepare
- A named owner for each process you want looked at
- Access to sample data from those processes
- Time with the people who do the work
- A contact in technology or security for access and controls
How Sendient approaches this
Our AI readiness review is short and fixed in scope. It ranks your processes, picks the first and shows it working on your own data. From there, First Workflow Live puts that workflow into use, measured against the baseline we agreed, with our fee tied to at least 3x improvement on it.
